Make your own free website on Tripod.com
Home | ROA's Bylaws | Roa's Constitution
Things you didn't know about the ROA

 

ROA MEMBERS:

 

Only after trying unsuccessfully to secure, from the ROA Board, very basic ROA operating and financial information which every member has a right to know, we had to resort to going to appropriate Commonwealth of Virginia agencies where this information should have been properly filed at formation and kept current thereafter.  The result was a negative search since Richmond Orchid Alliance never filed all necessary information pertaining to fund raising and other activity in the Commonwealth of Virginia.  The Freedom of Information Act is applicable and every ROA member and anyone else has the right to ask for the operating and financial information of this 501c3 group receiving donations of any kind in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The various information that follows, can lead you to the regulations that govern this situation.  ROA has never properly operated under these regulations and as a result is non-compliant with their obligation to the Commonwealth of Virginia and to properly represent the ROA membership.

 

 

       Nonprofits are accountable to the public, their funders, and, in some instances, government granting bodies, and it is vital to establish a system of controls (checks and balances) when establishing the organization’s accounting practices. Responsible financial management requires the establishment of an accounting system that meets both current and anticipated needs.

       Fulfill charitable solicitation law requirements. If your organization’s plans include fundraising, be aware that many states and few local jurisdictions regulate organizations that solicit funds within that state, county, or city.

 

 

Pertinent INFO and LINKS:

Charitable Search

The Office of Consumer Affairs (OCA) is responsible for the administration of the Virginia Solicitation of Contributions Law. The law requires any organization soliciting in Virginia to file with OCA. Registration does not imply endorsement of a public solicitation for contributions. Before contributing it is always advisable to determine if the group is filed with OCA and to review financial information on the organization to determine how they intend to spend your contribution. Use this search to determine the filing status and other information about charitable organizations, professional fundraising counsel and professional solicitors.

 Definitions

"Charitable organization" means any person which is or holds itself out to be organized or operated for any charitable purpose, or any person which solicits or obtains contributions solicited from the public. This definition shall not be deemed to include (i) any church or convention or association of churches, primarily operated for nonsecular purposes and no part of the net income of which inures to the direct benefit of any individual; (ii) any political party as defined in § 24.2-101 or any political campaign committee or political action committee or other political committee required by state or federal law to file a report or statement of contributions and expenditures; or (iii) any authorized individual who solicits, by authority of such organization, solely on behalf of a registered or exempt charitable organization or on behalf of an organization excluded from the definition of charitable organization.

Contribution" means any gift, bequest, devise or other grant of any money, credit, financial assistance or property of any kind or value, including the promise to contribute, except payments by the membership of an organization for membership fees, dues, fines, or assessments, or for services rendered to individual members, and except money, credit, financial assistance or property received from any governmental authority. The term "contribution" shall not include any donation of blood or any gift made pursuant to Article 2 (§ 32.1-289 et seq.) of Chapter 8 of Title 32.1.

 

 

"Solicit" and "solicitation" mean the request or appeal, directly or indirectly, for any contribution on the plea or representation that such contribution will be used for a charitable purpose, including, without limitation, the following methods of requesting such contribution:

1. Any oral or written request;

2. Any announcement to the press, over the radio or television, or by telephone or telegraph concerning an appeal or campaign to which the public is requested to make a contribution for any charitable purpose connected therewith;

3. The distribution, circulation, posting or publishing of any handbill, written advertisement or other publication which directly or by implication seeks to obtain public support; or

4. The sale of, offer or attempt to sell, any advertisement, advertising space, subscription, ticket, or any service or tangible item in connection with which any appeal is made for any charitable purpose or where the name of any charitable or civic organization is used or referred to in any such appeal as an inducement or reason for making any such sale, or when or where in connection with any such sale, any statement is made that the whole or any part of the proceeds from any such sale will be donated to any charitable purpose.

A. Every charitable organization, except as otherwise provided in this chapter, which intends to solicit contributions within the Commonwealth, or have funds solicited on its behalf, shall, prior to any solicitation, file an initial registration statement with the Commissioner upon forms acceptable to him. Each registration statement shall thereafter be refiled on or before the fifteenth day of the fifth calendar month of the next and each following fiscal year in which such charitable organization is engaged in solicitation activities within the Commonwealth. It shall be the duty of the president, chairman or principal officer of such charitable organization to file the statements required under this chapter. A charitable organization's registration statement may alternatively be filed online on a website approved by the Commissioner.

Link:     http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+57-48

 

Links:

Website info:  Rules Governing the Solicitation of Contributions (PDF 89KB)

 

§ 57-56. Information filed to become public records.

Registration statements, reports, professional fund-raising counsel contracts or professional solicitor contracts and all other documents and information required to be filed under this chapter shall become public records in the office of the Commissioner, and shall be open to the general public for inspection at such time and under such conditions as the Commissioner may prescribe. A charge not exceeding one dollar per page may be made for any copy of such documents and information as may be furnished any person by the Commissioner.

(1974, c. 574; 1979, c. 595.)

§ 57-53. Records to be kept by charitable organizations.

Every charitable organization shall keep true fiscal records for all fiscal years beginning on and after January 1, 1975, in accordance with the standards and practices set out in Standards of Accounting and Financial Reporting for Voluntary Health and Welfare Organizations adopted and approved in December, 1964, by the National Health Council and National Social Welfare Assembly, and as may be modified from time to time by the National Health Council and the National Assembly for Policy and Development, or in accordance with the standards and practices set out in Uniform Chart of Accounts and Definitions for Hospitals as approved by, and as may be modified by, the American Hospital Association, or in accordance with such other uniform standards of accounting as the Commissioner may find to be as appropriate. A copy of such standards shall be maintained on file in the office of the Commissioner. Such records shall be retained for a period of at least three years after the end of the period of registration to which they relate.

(1974, c. 574; 1979, c. 595.)

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+57-53

Other links

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+57-48

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+57-49

 

 

 

 

Some New Info

 

 

Subject:

(no subject)

Date:

7/26/2006

From:

 

Reply To:

 

To:

akinb@comcast.net, pksue@comcast.net, wandrako@comcast.net, baynehawkins@comcast.net

CC:

 

BCC:

 

Sent on:

 

 

 

 

 

Internet Address Card Attached

 

 

From:

 

Just one more thing that added fuel to the fire and put me out of the loop…..since I was addressed as V-chair at the last board meeting why is it not stated in the bulletin and who made the decision who is listed and not listed? P.S. No reply answers to emails sent over the weekend regarding budget items that I’m suppose to oversee. SHAME, SHAME ON THE BOARD WHO EVER THEY ARE!!!!

 

Richmond Orchid Alliance

We are all about Orchids!

Jim Creech, Editor

(orchidalliance@aol.com)

July 2006

Board of Directors

Bill Akin – Chair

  – Vice Chair

Sue Akin – Director of Finance

Kathy Walker – Director of Records

Valli LaNeve – Director of Outreach

Jim Creech – Director of Member

Services

Wanda Andrako – Director at Large

Bayne Hawkins – Director at Large

 

*Copied from July 2006 Bulletin

 

Subject:

Board Minutes 7-11-06

Date:

8/23/2006

From:

 

Reply To:

 

To:

akinb@comcast.net, pksue@comcast.net, laneve@infionline.net, wandrako@comcast.net, baynehawkins@comcast.net

CC:

 

BCC:

 

Sent on:

 

 

 

 

 

Internet Address Card Attached

 

 

Attached board minutes. (Not included in this  attachment)

 

As any other paid member in good standing with ROA I believe all of the membership should be notified of all board meetings, have

available a copy of board minutes, income and expenditure statements, notified of any bylaw and constitution changes and

election and appointment of officers.

Kathy

 

  

 

Subject:

(no subject)

Date:

9/9/2006

From:

 

Reply To:

 

To:

akinb@comcast.net, pksue@comcast.net, baynehawkins@comcast.net, wandrako@comcast.net

CC:

 

 

 

Sent on:

 

 

 

 

 

 After being away from the board for over a month I still have not received a reasonable reply about the $63.00 that was taken out of my hospitality budget. So what is the $63.00 question and I want a simple answer.

 

Also it obvious that a change to by-laws and restructuring has taken place and as a paid member I want a copy emailed to me along with any revision on the last set of minutes that I submitted.

 

With no input from membership the following changes - apparently in by-laws and for sure in titles and people took place within ROA.

Richmond Orchid Alliance

We are all about Orchids!

Jim Creech, Editor

(2ROA@comcast.net)

August 2006

Board of Directors

Bill Akin – President

Wanda Andrako – Vice President

Sue Akin – Treasurer

Nancy Thompson – Secretary

Valli LaNeve –Outreach Director

Jim Creech – Publications Director

Bayne Hawkins – Director at Large

Thuyen Trevino – Director at Large

 

*Copied from August 2006 Bulletin

 

In a message dated 7/21/2006 10:49:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time, akinb@comcast.net writes:

The $63 are part of the expenses Barbara Noe turned in and the offsetting income donation is shown in the "contributions in kind" income.  As these offset, it will be just as simple if you want to reduce both sides of the entry.   It was felt that it should be shown e to fully show the costs of the year.

 

Barbara Noe, in fact, donated to the Discover Orchids! show as follows:

 

Please provide a letter to cover my $1,276.23 donation to DISCOVER ORCHIDS! (or whatever it comes to after all others are satisfied…..leaving absolutely nothing to be paid for from ROA funds!!!)                                                                                $1526.23 is the actual total of the Noe donation to the show effort but WCVE should give a receipt to use for the Day Sponsorship! * Copied from statement submitted to  ROA Board

 

SO OBVIOUSLY SOME CREATIVE OFFSET BOOKEEPING TOOK PLACE AND TO THIS DAY KATHY WALKER HAS NOT BEEN TOLD WHAT THE $63.00 MISSING FROM HER HOSPITALITY BUDGET.....WHAT WAS IT?....AND WHY WAS IT ATTRIBUTED TO THE DISCOVER ORCHIDS SHOW WHEN, IN FACT, ZERO RICHMOND ORCHID ALLIANCE FUNDS WENT TOWARD THAT EVENT.

 

 

 

ROA members ...Please note the first date I asked for this information (7/26/2006) that every member has a right to and the date this finally arrived (and what does it actually say)?

 

SO FELLOW ROA MEMBERS PLEASE ASK YOURSELF THIS…

 

1.  WHY IS THE MEMBERSHIPS BLATANTLY BEING DENIED ACCESS TO BY LAWS THAT HAVE HAD (2 or three times) MAJOR STRUCTURAL CHANGES SINCE THE FORMATION? AS A PAST BOARD MEMBER I WAS IN THE DARK; THIS ORGANIZATION WILL SOON BE TWO YEARS OLD  SO WHY ISN’T THIS INFO BEING SHARED.....WHAT’S THE BIG SECRET?

2.  WHY IS THE MEMBERSHIP DENIED ACCESS TO FINANCE INFORMATION, BUDGETS AND OFFICER ELECTIONS OR HOW THIS ORGANIZATION IS OPERATED.

 

ALL ROA MEMBERS HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW!!!!!

 

Kathy Walker's Letter of Resignation

July 26, 2006

Members of the Richmond Orchid Alliance Board

Bill and Sue Akin, Wanda Andrako, Bayne Hawkins

I submit my resignation as of today July 26, 2006. I have come to this decision based on the actions and atmosphere at the last board meeting considered along with some prior and more recent events that were so very discouraging to one who has put their heart and time into this group. I feel that the current board has lost its original focus and cohesive spirit based on ROA’s mission and values. Yes, I do have values and integrity that some on this board are very much lacking. I plan to maintain my membership. You are on you own now to hand out your grunt work to someone else. Maybe some of the dead weight on the board will have to do a little more actual gofer work.

All ROA minutes and materials will be left in the resource cabinet, plants will be left on the table at the August meeting so they will be ready for your pickup, the receipt book will be mailed and I will send you a check for the market cash.

From your recent actions of telling me every little thing to do in my job as though you have previously discussed and decided on things, it seems that some of you have forgotten that I have held and worked in almost all of the elected and appointed positions necessary in an orchid organization as an officer and committee member or chair. Actually, I have had far more experience than most of you; certainly more current experience than any of you. At times I have enjoyed this work very much. Now, it is not so enjoyable because it takes too much energy dodging the mine field constantly being created by some of the board for their own amusement and gain.

Over the many years in another orchid organization, securing program speakers was one of my duties and I did a good job of it. I do know what to do and how to go about obtaining a program speaker without so much meddling from others. But it seems that many have forgotten my previous experience and just want me to be your gofer without any say on the quality or type of program or speakers. Frankly, if some of you would have stood behind Barbara earlier this year, maybe this organization would not be in this position now. It was necessary at first to have some enjoyable quality speakers that had not been in this area before in order to build membership and get ROA involved in the regional and national orchid community. Yes, she is my friend and I don’t back stab my friends as some find it so easy to do. Let me assure you, however, that I am a 54 year old woman with a responsible job and a mind of my own so the suggestion by some of you that I let others do my thinking is insulting and every one of you should be ashamed of yourselves. Remember what goes around – comes around!

Since March I have been told three different amounts of money regarding future program expenses: $1700 at the March meeting, then Bill in the parking lot of the SMV stated to me I would have the same amount as set forth in 2006 and finally at the last board meeting the amount of $2500. This is no way to run an organization changing important things like this behind the scenes at someone’s whim. It seems nothing is discussed anymore; at least not with me I just get the information passed on as final and expected….BINGO …. to make it happen.

Then as I recently read Jim Creech’s instructions for action to Bill and Bill’s notes of agreement, (reference email of July 11th) the picture became perfectly clear that things were exactly as I had suspected with Jim (and Valli) using behind the scenes teamster tactics having the final word in ROA by leading the board around by the ring in their noses and all done without the knowledge of the full board. 

Some other things that have led to my final decision:

  1. Changing of the by-laws. This is ridiculous! Who master minded this plan? And when? Behind the scenes, for sure! Maybe add a committee or two but no major structure changes. Continuing to change these documents just to fit specific people is very unprofessional but since by-laws have been brought up perhaps a major addition should be that “No spouses or couples serve on the board at the same time.” I believe the membership would definitely be in favor of this action if they had any say in running ROA.
  1. The June meeting. The embarrassment of Valli’s hot air sermon to the ROA membership on volunteering. It may have blown by some of the others but not me. Maybe the membership needs to know that she has been doing absolutely nothing outside of her stated position in the by-laws. Plus her monthly harassing and prying phone calls that several members have commented on. You know she likes to ask questions as a way to get her own answers so she can pass them on as gospel.

Then to mention at the last board meeting that she wanted to have some type of childish game with a world class speaker in attendance. She continues to show her stupidity. But as usual she knows so little about the way the ORCHID WORLD operates AND FRANKLY DOESN’T SEEM TO CARE TO CONFORM TO THE WAY THINGS USUALLY WORK. She continues to try to use her ‘teamster tactics’ in her dealings with orchid people acting like she knows far more than she does. Tell me what she has done beside her defined job (and areas of that were left undone at critical times) that she has done in the past year except one shift at the Fair and recently repotting orchids. She was never at any outreach opportunities and AWOL from the show. A lot more could be added but I think you all are aware of this.

  1. Furthermore Jim talking about not being able to get into the orchid alliance site. Don’t most of you know that Barbara had major computer problems? Someone with access was roaming around her personal WORD documents. 
  1. Accused of being defiant when asked to contact certain speakers that the board suddenly wanted. I will not be embarrassed outside ROA when talking to friends and others I’ve met at shows and events by being expected to call on them for favors at the last minute and to try to get them to come at less than their usual expected rates. Remember theses speakers are not waiting around for ROA to call. They should be treated with dignity and respect during planning and especially negotiations (not trying to get a cut rate price from someone that is doing us a favor to travel here to speak) and also not to be hounded for free plants that don’t sell while they are here.
  1. The way Jim Creech acted at the Discover Orchids Show; I was so embarrassed for this organization. How dare he do this? After some of us worked our butts off and he had the audacity to question Jim Gresham’s judging program; something he doesn’t know beans about and it was very disruptive to the show process. Frankly, you know most likely this was part of their little planned scheme. So I guess that’s when Valli Laneve was adding the final icing to her dry cake.

So to finalize, I will still enjoy my orchids, attend any orchid meeting or events anywhere when it suits me and have a life that does not include people who thrive on keeping things stirred up as two of our board members have done from day one in ROA and in VOS before that. But you all know this and don’t have the backbone to say it.

It’s a shame that it has to come down to this but maybe as a regular member I can achieve the goal of experiencing “an atmosphere of good will and collegiality”.

Respectfully Submitted by,

Kathy Walker

 Here is some background information on why I reached this decision.

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Kathy

To: wandrako@comcast.net

Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 6:24 PM

Subject: (no subject)

 

After last night’s board meeting is there still a plan to get rid of the CREECHES.......Yes or No?

 

Kathy 

 

 

 

 

 

In a message dated 7/13/2006 4:30:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time, wandrako@comcast.net writes:

 

What did they do at the board meeting that bothered you?

 

 

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Kathy

To: wandrako@comcast.net

Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:13 PM

Subject: Re: (no subject)

 

Well, Wanda it's very simple.  They, and everyone else there but Kathy Walker, appeared smugly aware

of everything that was mentioned.  There was no discussion as a board.  Everything seemed already

decided.  Why?  What happened to the plan to just keep them at bay and keep things afloat and get

rid of them at the end of this year?  Now it appears that they get more embedded, more involved and

more important every day.  Who decided this?  And who decided that Kathy Walker is now an outsider

on this board?

 

Ya know Wanda....If Bill Akin would had farted, Valli would have been there to catch it. The discussion

of an auction, Valli's reply was to purchase 200 plants, my God......be realistic.

 

Plus that comment she made about some game at the beginning of the meeting when Norman Fang

is here. That man is a world known orchid grower and speaker. ROA will be the laughing stock of

the world. He's Asian remember that, they are bright people and perfectionist in their field.....he

would not be impressed by her stupidity. But I guess that's one of her stupid team building fantasy's

that she envisions will empower her even more.....she better come into the 21st century .....we are

a NON PROFIT organization not a teamster union or Target'. I felt really embarrassed for ROA with

that dumb ass sermon she made at the last meeting with Frowine. 

Of all people to preach on volunteering and helping.  If she wants to flap her jaw then 

it should be on how to give a snow job ......but I can say one thing she's great at being a real PHONY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Re: (no subject)

Date: 7/16/2006 10:05:09 PM Eastern  Daylight Time

From: wandrako@comcast.net

 

             

 

Reply To:

 

To: Kathy

 

CC:

 

BCC:

 

Sent on:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I guess I can see why you were upset.  As far as I know, there was no discussion prior to the meeting about anything other than we had to discuss the finances.  There was no reason for you to feel left out since it was all new to us also. 

 

The stuff about the game was stupid and I didn't understand it and so ignored it but will talk to Bill to make sure it doesn't happen. 

 

As far as I saw there WAS discussion about a number of things.  The two most important were finances and programs particularly one for August.  Sorry you haven't been able to reach Hal.  He very well may be in Israel.  He may be retired now.  You may be able to get him for a regular program later in the year such as January or February when we have to have a speaker from nearby because of weather concerns. 

 

No, there will not be 200 plants and I didn't hear her say that.  I would stop at 100 at the most. 

 

I did not get upset about Valli's asking for volunteers.  She called people to help with the potting and got them!  It is a good thing she did or we would still be out there by the tracks!  She got one woman that had joined and had never been to a meeting but she came and helped and bet she will be at meetings now.  There are things she does well.  She may talk too long on the phone but some seem to like it.  Others like me, don't want to spend hours on the phone.  I did mention it and if there is opportunity, Bill will say something to her. 

 

You did say in the meeting that you would not "be second guessed" on the programs (I think that was what you were referring to).  That did jar me a bit.  I don't understand where that came from.  We, as a group, need to make sure that we have good programs at a price we can afford.  This is not a one man operation.  We are not bringing in great sums of money and need to budget carefully but still have good speakers.  They don't have to come from California or places where we would have a big plane fare.  You know what you have to work with but they were just giving suggestions of some that are within reach and more reasonable than some of the really big name speakers. 

 

The worst program we had this year was an expensive one.  We don't know all the big names but do know when they can get their material across in an interesting way and we learn from it.  The big names haven't drawn in the ones from VOS that should have or did know who they were.  For the most part, the attendance was our own group and that is what we have to plan for.  Of course, publicity really helps. 

 

With 100 members now we are probably ahead of them in people but certainly not in terms of money.

 

The auction does have to happen in October so that we can finance the programs after the first of the year!  That worries me the most. 

 

Don't think that you are being left out of anything.  There isn't a bunch of communication with anyone right now.  Everyone is too busy.  I needed to get to Barbara's for the last several weeks and haven't made it yet.  Family, dr appointments, all that stuff and I haven't begun to pot!!  According to Hackney, I should be thru by now!  I am lucky when I finish before August!!

 

Glad Barbara told me about that Home Depot stuff.  I use that on a lot of things.  It works well.

 

I will have work going on here again shortly and that will tear up part of the house.  O wonderful!! 

 

Don't get paranoid on us. 

We need your good sense and input. 

 

Email me

HERE